|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
________________________________________________
)
CENTER FOR NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES, )
ET AL., )
Plaintiffs, )
)
v. ) Civil Action
) No. 01-2500
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, )
) Judge Kessler
Defendant. )
________________________________________________)
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF JAMES S. REYNOLDS
I, James S. Reynolds, declare as follows:
1. This Declaration supplements and is a continuation of my previous Declaration
dated January 11, 2002. I have read Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay Proceedings on
Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion Pending Discovery.
2. Since September 11, 2001, many individuals were questioned by federal, state,
and local law enforcement agencies about the terrorist attacks but not formally
taken into custody. While DOJ attempted at one time to keep and publicly release
a count of all persons contacted by law enforcement in connection with the attacks,
even if they were just briefly stopped, it became clear that this was impractical.
Eventually, DOJ concluded that it was better to focus on the individuals who
were formally taken into custody because they were believed to have violated
federal criminal law or the immigration laws, or were believed to have information
material to grand jury investigations emanating from the events of September
11.
3. The total number of individuals detained pursuant to the investigation is
fluid. On any given day since September 11 the FBI has followed leads which
may have resulted in the apprehension of additional individuals suspected of
connections to terrorism. By the same token, persons believed not to be of current
interest regarding the investigations emanating from the September 11th attacks
are placed in an "inactive" status and may have been released from
custody or deported. For these reasons, and because public officials have used
different sets of numbers and different definitions of the term "detainee"
over time, comparisons of public statements by various officials about the total
number of detainees is bound to produce different, and imprecise, numbers.
4. As with the INS detainees, the total number of persons charged with federal
crimes in the aftermath of the September 11th attacks will change over time,
sometimes from day to day, so that comparisons of public statements on the total
number of charged defendants will vary as well.
5. Because the investigation is active and ongoing, disclosing the identities
of detainees who have been placed in inactive status, whether released from
custody or not, could still harm the investigation. Even though such detainees
may not themselves be of current investigative interest, the same harms described
in my prior declaration at paragraphs 14-16 could occur if their names are disclosed.
6. Specifically, disclosure could inform terrorist organizations about what
evidence law enforcement has obtained, or, just as importantly, has not obtained.
Disclosure could reveal investigative methods, sources, and witnesses. The individuals
involved could be subjected to intimidation or harm, thereby discouraging or
preventing them from supplying valuable information or leads in the future.
Disclosure could deter these individuals from cooperating with the Department
of Justice after they are released from custody for fear of retaliation by terrorist
organizations against them or their family members and associates. Disclosure
could reveal important information about the direction, progress, focus and
scope of the investigation, and thereby assist terrorist organizations in counteracting
our investigative efforts. For example, disclosing information about persons
who are not currently the subject of investigative interest may inform terrorist
organizations of routes of investigation that were followed but eventually abandoned.
Such information could provide insights into the past and current strategies
and tactics of law enforcement agencies conducting the investigation.
7. Moreover, because the investigation is fluid and evolving, the significance
of a given detainee may change over time. For example, a particular detainee
who had been determined to be of no investigative interest in November 2001was
returned to the active interest category later that month after a reevaluation
by law enforcement components involved in the investigation.
8. Exhibit 5 of the Government's motion for summary judgment is a list of persons
charged with federal crimes in the aftermath of the September 11th attacks.
The names of sixteen individuals were inadvertently omitted from that list.
The Government is submitting with its response to plaintiff's motion to stay
proceedings an amended Exhibit 5 which contains the pertinent information about
those individuals.
9. Paragraph 39 of my prior declaration states that there are ten orders by
courts "sealing proceedings in connection with individuals arrested or
detained in the wake of the September 11 attack. . . . " Although the intended
meaning should be apparent upon close scrutiny, I want to make explicit that
paragraph 39 refers to cases in which a defendant had been charged with a federal
crime, and not to cases in which an individual had been taken into custody under
a material witness warrant. Also, the total number of sealed criminal cases
on January 11, 2002 was nine, rather than ten. The tenth defendant's case was
originally sealed, but was unsealed on or before January 11th . The identity
and other pertinent information about this defendant was included in Exhibit
5 of the Government's motion for summary judgment. As with the number of persons
charged with federal crimes and the number of INS detainees, the number of criminal
cases under seal changes from time to time as the courts enter unsealing orders,
and as new cases are charged which are placed under seal by the courts after
a request from the prosecutors.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
________________ ______________________________
DATE JAMES S. REYNOLDS
 Add as favourites (20) |  Quote this article on your site | Views: 938
|
- Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
- Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
- Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
- Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
- Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
|
Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6
AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze - www.mamboportal.com
All right reserved |
Be first to comment this article
